Aumentó el antisemitismo en Venezuela. Anti-Semitism. Report 2007
El Departamento de Estado (USA) en su informe anual sobre libertad de culto señala que aumentó el antisemitismo en Venezuela. “Se produjo un aumento del vandalismo antisemita, caricaturas, intimidaciones y ataques físicos contra instituciones judías” en Venezuela. Gobierno de Chávez dice que fue “hecho con maldad”. El informe completo en leer más.
“The International Religious Freedom report is submitted to Congress annually by the Department of State in compliance with Section 102(b) of the International Religious Freedom Act (IRFA) of 1998. This report supplements the most recent Human Rights Reports by providing additional detailed information with respect to matters involving international religious freedom. It includes individual country chapters on the status of religious freedom worldwide”. In this link 2007 Report on International Religious Freedom. About Venezuela: “Anti-Semitism. The President, government officials, and government-affiliated media outlets promoted anti-Semitism through numerous anti-Semitic comments that created a spillover effect into mainstream society. There was a rise in anti-Semitic vandalism, caricatures, expressions at rallies, intimidation, and physical attacks against Jewish institutions”. Can read it here. Look in leer más. Martha Colmenares
usa- informe- venezuela
Venezuela
EEUU asegura que actos de antisemitismo aumentaron en Venezuela
viernes, 14 de septiembre de 2007
AFP
Los actos de antisemitismo aumentaron en Venezuela donde el Gobierno del presidente Hugo Chávez se esforzó por limitar “la influencia” de la Iglesia Católica y de grupos misioneros, aseguró este viernes el Departamento de Estado en su informe anual sobre libertad de culto. “Se produjo un aumento del vandalismo antisemita, caricaturas, intimidaciones y ataques físicos contra instituciones judías” en Venezuela, país que mantiene tensas relaciones con Washington, afirmó el Departamento de Estado, en su informe sobre la libertad de religión en el mundo en 2006 y 2007.
“El presidente, miembros del Gobierno y medios de comunicación cercanos al poder efectuaron numerosos comentarios antisemitas que se extendieron por los canales principales de la sociedad”, añadió el Gobierno norteamericano, que suele destacar a Venezuela y Cuba en su lista de países con problemas.
Entre los ejemplos señalados por el Departamento de Estado, figuran varias declaraciones del presidente Chávez, entre ellas una comparación hecha en Doha en agosto de 2006, cuando “relacionó el comportamiento israelí con el de los nazis”, durante la guerra entre Israel y el Hezbolá.
De una manera general, el informe denunció “esfuerzos por parte del Gobierno, por motivos políticos, de limitar la influencia de la Iglesia Católica y de los grupos misioneros en algunas áreas sociales y políticas”.
“El presidente Chávez lanzó una serie de ataques personales contra ciertos obispos católicos (…) y les advirtió de que tenían que evitar hacer comentarios sobre asuntos políticos”, sostuvo el documento estadounidense.
El Gobierno de Venezuela mantiene frecuentes cruces de acusaciones con Washington
TOMADO DE MEGARESISTENCIA
http://www.megaresistencia.com/content/view/571/1/
Por su parte,
Gobierno de Chávez rechazó informe de EE.UU. sobre antisemitismo en Venezuela
(EFE)- El canciller venezolano, Nicolás Maduro, rechazó hoy un informe del Departamento de Estado de EE.UU., que, según Caracas, fue “hecho con maldad” y que acusó al gobierno del presidente Hugo Chávez de promover el antisemitismo.
“Es un informe hecho con maldad (…) que evidencia el sistema imperial” de Estados Unidos, y “no lo reconocemos y lo repudiamos”, declaró Maduro a los periodistas.
El ministro de Relaciones Exteriores sostuvo que el informe “es una prueba más de cómo Estados Unidos se inmiscuye en asuntos internos y falsea la realidad, manipulándola” como parte de una “campaña internacional” contra el gobierno de Chávez.
Maduro señaló, además, que Washington “pretende ser la contraloría mundial”, y aseveró que “eso se tiene que acabar, más temprano que tarde”.
“Venezuela no acepta ni hoy ni jamás, que se pretenda decir si nos portamos bien o si nos portamos mal”, agregó el canciller.
Según Caracas y medios de comunicación venezolanos, el informe anual sobre la libertad de religión en el mundo del Departamento de Estado afirmó que los actos de antisemitismo en Venezuela aumentaron en el último año.
Maduro aseguró que en su país existe “absoluta libertad de culto”, y rechazó enérgicamente que se haya registrado algún “acto vandálico” contra la comunidad judía, como, aseguró, se indica en el informe estadounidense.
“Dicen en este informe mentiras” como que se han registrado de “actos vandálicos antisemitas y que perseguimos a los judíos.
¿Dónde, contra quién? Qué muestran una sola prueba … ¡Falso!”, manifestó el jefe de la diplomacia venezolana.
El canciller rechazó que Washington califique como una acción antisemita venezolana la “legítima opinión política” del gobierno de Chávez de “repudiar”, igual que lo hizo el mundo entero, “los bombardeos” lanzados por el gobierno de Israel contra el Líbano hace más de un año.
“Son opiniones justas, que defendemos, y que defendió toda la comunidad internacional en contra del bombardeo y la guerra contra el pueblo humilde e inocente del Líbano. No es antisemitismo, es culpa del gobierno de Israel haber cometido el error de esa guerra, como hoy lo reconoce”, afirmó Maduro.
Venezuela y Estados Unidos han mantenido unas complicadas relaciones diplomáticas desde la llegada de Chávez al poder, en 1999, salpicadas de amenazas de ruptura que no han llegado a materializarse.
Las relaciones diplomáticas entre Caracas y Washington están marcadas por constantes acusaciones mutuas, referidas al corte “imperialista e intervencionista” de Estados Unidos y a las “intenciones totalitarias” del gobierno de Chávez, respectivamente.
EFE gf/cr
Terra/EFE
http://www.terra.com/noticias/articulo/html/act966929.htm
Venezuela
International Religious Freedom Report 2007
Released by the Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights, and Labor
The Constitution provides for freedom of religion, on the condition that its practice does not violate public morality, decency, or the public order, and the Government generally respected this right in practice.
There were some efforts by the Government, motivated by political reasons, to limit the influence of religious groups in certain geographic, social, and political areas.
There were no reports of societal abuses or discrimination based on religious belief or practice.
The U.S. Government discusses religious freedom issues with the Government as part of its overall policy to promote human rights.
Section I. Religious Demography
The country has an area of 352,144 square miles and a population of 27 million. According to government estimates, 92 percent of the population is Roman Catholic, and the remaining 8 percent is Protestant, practiced other religions, or is atheist. The Venezuelan Evangelical Council estimated that evangelical Protestants constitute approximately 10 percent of the population. A variety of missionary groups are present.
There are small but influential Jewish and Muslim communities. The Jewish community numbers approximately 15,000 and is most active in the capital, Caracas. The Muslim community of more than 100,000 is concentrated among persons of Lebanese and Syrian descent living in Nueva Esparta State and the Caracas area.
Section II. Status of Religious Freedom
Legal/Policy Framework
The Constitution provides for freedom of religion on the condition that the practice of a religion does not violate public morality, decency, and the public order; the Government generally respected this right in practice.
The Directorate of Justice and Religion (DJR) in the Ministry of Interior and Justice is mandated to maintain a registry of religious groups, disburse funds to religious organizations, and promote awareness and understanding among religious communities. Each group must register with the DJR to have legal status as a religious organization. Requirements for registration are largely administrative, the key exception being that groups serve the community’s social interests. Some groups have complained that the process is slow and inefficient. There were no accounts of the Government refusing to register certain religious groups in the period covered by this report.
A 1964 concordat governs relations between the Government and the Vatican and provides the basis for government subsidies to the Roman Catholic Church. All registered religious groups are eligible for funding to support religious services, but most money goes to Catholic organizations. While the Government continued to fund Catholic-operated schools during the period covered by this report, the Government directly funded the Episcopal Conference of Venezuela (CEV) at reduced levels. There were reports of continued government funding for certain evangelical groups, although much of this was related to social projects implemented via the Government’s social programs, and the specific amounts were unavailable.
Foreign missionaries require special visas. Missionaries expressed concern about refusal rates for first-time religious visas and, less frequently, renewals. Some missionary groups also complained that the religious visa process was prone to delays. The Government enforced visa requirements. The Government asked a group of Seventh-day Adventist university students and professors from the United States to cease providing medical care to indigenous persons in the State of Bolivar after the Government determined that the group did not have the proper visas and permits. In April 2007 the group departed the country.
U.S. missionaries of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints (Mormons) did not return to the country during the period covered by this report. In 2005 the Mormons withdrew 219 missionaries, citing difficulties in receiving religious visas.
The Government continued to provide annual subsidies to Catholic schools and social programs that help the poor, although such government subsidies were reduced in some states. Other religious groups are free to establish their own schools.
Restrictions on Religious Freedom
Government policy and practice contributed to the generally free practice of religion. The Constitution forbids the use of religion to avoid obeying the law or interfere with the rights of others; however, there were efforts by the Government, motivated by political reasons, to limit the influence of the Catholic Church and missionary groups in certain social and political areas. Leaders from a number of religious groups noted that since the reelection of President Chavez on December 6, 2006, the Government has been less open to dialogue.
The Government continued to prohibit foreign missionary groups from working in indigenous areas. In 2005 the Ministry of Interior rescinded permission for the New Tribes Mission (NTM) to conduct its social programs among indigenous tribes; NTM appealed to the Supreme Court, and the case remained pending at the end of the period covered by this report. The NTM withdrew more than 100 NTM missionaries from the indigenous areas in compliance with the Government’s order. Other foreign missionary groups working in the indigenous areas departed voluntarily.
On March 19, 2007, a Caracas municipal court sentenced Andres Jose Rodriguez Rojas to 15 years in prison for the April 2006 murder of a Catholic priest who worked for the CEV. The Catholic Church and the Government had initially clashed over the handling of this case.
In January 2007 the Government declared its intention to withdraw the broadcast license of NCTV, a regional Catholic Church-affiliated network. The Government and Church leaders reached an agreement by which NCTV continued operating in the states of Zulia and Carabobo but returned to state control other frequencies that NCTV was no longer using. Public confrontation between Catholic bishops and government officials continued. Vale TV continued to be broadcast as a Catholic-operated station during the period covered by this report.
President Chavez engaged in numerous rhetorical personal attacks on specific Catholic bishops, including during a January 8, 2007, swearing-in ceremony for his new cabinet and his January 10 inauguration address. He specifically warned Catholic bishops to refrain from commenting on political issues. Prior to the December 6, 2006, presidential election, the four senior leaders of the CEV sent President Chavez a letter urging him to respect minorities and to promote harmony, dialogue, and understanding among Venezuelans. During its January 7-13, 2007, meeting with all bishops, the CEV issued communiques urging the Government to respect political pluralism and freedom of expression.
The military chaplain corps consisted almost exclusively of Catholic priests. Although armed forces members of other religious groups were allowed to attend services of their faith, they did not have the same access to clergy members that Catholic service members enjoyed. During 2007 authorities tightly regulated and limited access of evangelical chaplains to prisons. In 2005 the Ministry of Interior and Justice permitted the entry of evangelical chaplains to several of the prisons, positions that formerly had been open only to Catholics.
There were no reports of religious prisoners or detainees in the country.
Forced Religious Conversion
There were no reports of forced religious conversion, including of minor U.S. citizens who had been abducted or illegally removed from the United States, or of the refusal to allow such citizens to be returned to the United States.
Anti-Semitism
The President, government officials, and government-affiliated media outlets promoted anti-Semitism through numerous anti-Semitic comments that created a spillover effect into mainstream society. There was a rise in anti-Semitic vandalism, caricatures, expressions at rallies, intimidation, and physical attacks against Jewish institutions.
The Anti-Defamation League (ADL) reported that the President and government officials expressed anti-Semitic sentiments, blaming Israel and the Jews for the world’s problems and utilizing stereotypes about Jewish financial influence and control. In criticizing Israel during the 2006 conflict between Hezbollah and Israel, President Chavez made anti-Semitic statements. On August 25, 2006, in Beijing, and again in Doha 3 days later, President Chavez likened Israeli behavior to that of the Nazis and reiterated the theme of genocide. On August 6, 2006, on the television program, Aló, Presidente, on Venezolana de Televisión, President Chavez accused Israelis of “applying to the Lebanese people and to the Palestinian people the same treatment they have so criticized about the Holocaust.” On July 28, 2006, in an interview broadcast domestically and on Al-Jazeera television, President Chavez stated that Israel’s actions regarding the Palestinians and Lebanon were “perpetrated in the fascist manner of Hitler… they are doing what Hitler did to the Jews.”
Government-sponsored media outlets utilized anti-Jewish caricatures and political cartoons on several occasions. The local Jewish community expressed strong concerns that such statements and publications fostered a climate permissive to anti-Semitic actions. The hosts of La Hojilla, a pro-Chavez talk show on official government television, made recurring anti-Semitic slurs, and the Government’s de facto official daily newspaper, Vea, regularly published anti-Semitic comments.
Extremely offensive anti-Semitic graffiti and leaflets appeared on synagogue walls and in Jewish neighborhoods and increased in the Caracas area following the July-August 2006 conflict involving Israel and Hezbollah. Between June and September 2006, buildings associated with the Jewish community were vandalized four times, according to an international Jewish group. Jewish leaders also expressed concern over the Government’s close relationship with Iran, whose President called repeatedly for the annihilation of the country of Israel.
Section III. Societal Abuses and Discrimination
There were no reports of societal abuses or discrimination based on religious belief or practice.
Section IV. U.S. Government Policy
The U.S. Government discusses religious freedom issues with the Government as part of its overall policy to promote human rights. The Embassy maintained close contact with various religious communities. The U.S. Ambassador met regularly with religious authorities and when appropriate sought to raise their concerns with appropriate government officials. Embassy representatives’ access to government officials was limited.
Released on September 14, 2007
International Religious Freedom Report Home Page



























Septiembre 16th, 2007 at 2:04 am
No se puede ocultar a un elefante tras una margarita, no es sólo el anitisemitismo absurdo y condicionado por la “hermandad” con el régimen iraní propagado por una multitud de loritos y lacayos del candidato a emperador sino sus constantes muestras de intolerancia, su etnocentrismo desfasado y su exacerbada xenofobia.
Habrase visto tamaña estupidez; Venezuela fue, precisamente, la primer nación en dar cobijo a los judios que huían de Europa al comienzo de las persecuciones Nazis… ¿como se llamaba el barco?, caramba lo tengo en la punta de la lengua, hay un excelente documental al respecto que vi en las pantallas de Vale TV
Septiembre 16th, 2007 at 2:37 am
No lo sé, sólo que eran dos barcos después de la segunda guerra mundial. le preguntaré, si no recuerdas, a Sammy Eppel.
Un abrazo, Martha Colmenares
Septiembre 17th, 2007 at 1:28 pm
ESTO LO DIJO JOSEPH PULITZER EN 1902:
“El Periodismo Verdadero se asegura de no
parcializarse jamás, pase lo que pase.
Si el periodismo es ético y profesional ofrecerá las dos caras de
una moneda, y la versión de cada bando en un conflicto, y las
mostrará siempre a partes iguales…
Si no lo hace, entonces no es Periodismo: Es sólo basura, y de la peor
clase, es decir, la típica basura que se vende a sí misma a cualquier
otro interés político o económico distinto a la verdad real de las cosas.”
Joseph Pulitzer
Periodista norteamericano, de origen hungaro que dió origen
al famoso e internacionalmente reconocido
“Premio Pulitzer de Periodismo”